Is your new idea better or just newer?
Description: We examine the unique intellectual journeys of philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein and rock star Eddie Van Halen, highlighting the tug of war between evolving ideas and the immediacy bias. Explore how understanding this dynamic can aid thought leaders in balancing past achievements with present growth, and learn practical strategies for maintaining this balance in your own intellectual pursuits.
What do a philosopher and a rock star have in common? In this case, a profound lesson on self-progress and innovation.
Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein spent his lifetime wrestling with the philosophy of language, creating works that contradicted each other, perplexing his followers.
On the other side of the cultural spectrum, legendary guitarist Eddie Van Halen, known for his groundbreaking sound, couldn't quite appreciate the brilliance of his early work that fans idolize.
Before we try to learn anything from their lives, let's take a deeper look at each of their stories.
Wittgenstein’s Writing
Consider Ludwig Wittgenstein, the great Austrian philosopher of language, who remarkably outlived his own work.
As a fiery young philosopher, he was brimming with ideas and theories. His most famous was the "picture theory of meaning," which he outlined in his seminal work the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.
Wittgenstein audaciously pronounced that this book had definitively solved all the problems of philosophy.
And thus, he retired.
Because of course, if you've solved all the problems in your field, there's nothing left to do.
Wittgenstein became a rural elementary school teacher in Austria, leaving the hallowed halls of academia. Yes, really. But that wasn't the end of his journey.
Two decades later, he found himself drawn back into philosophy's intricate maze, mainly because he was haunted by a growing realization. He had come to believe that his early work was fundamentally flawed, that he had missed the mark in the Tractatus.
So he began producing new work that explicitly contradicted his earlier theories.
This abrupt about-face came as a shock for those who had become disciples of his early work, scholars who had spent years decoding and deliberating the ideas in the Tractatus.
Suddenly, they found themselves engaged in heated debates not with Wittgenstein's detractors, but Wittgenstein himself!
These disciples argued passionately that Wittgenstein was right the first time and was now straying from the path.
Edward’s Evolution
Parallel to Wittgenstein's saga, we can find an echo in the world of music.
Eddie Van Halen, revered as one of the greatest guitarists of all time, was a master of innovation. He could make a guitar sing, scream, or weep like no other.
His debut album, entitled Van Halen, became a symbol of a seismic shift in rock music, a veritable guitarist's bible. The guitar tone on that album is held up as the gold standard. For decades, generations of guitarists have attempted to replicate that sound, to capture that particular blend of sonic magic.
However, in a twist of irony, after Eddie's passing, his son Wolfgang Van Halen revealed an astonishing fact in an interview with Total Guitar:
"When were on the 2012 tour, [Pearl Jam’s] Mike McCready and Eddie Vedder came backstage. Mike was talking to Dad. He said, 'Oh man, the first Van Halen album sounded so good.' My dad growls, 'It sounded like shit!' Mike was just like, 'Oh, okay. Well... I liked it.'"
Eddie, who had moved the musical world with his debut album's tone, thought that the tone on that first album, well... sucked.
This revelation stunned guitarists and fans worldwide. Most would argue vehemently with Eddie Van Halen, that he, in his infinite musical wisdom, was wrong about his own work.
A Paradox of Innovation
These icons' relationship with their work presents an intriguing paradox to all aspiring thought leaders - the tug of war between evolving ideas and the immediacy bias. Let's dive into the sea of introspection, shall we?
The Dance of Evolving Ideas
As a thought leader, your ideas are your lifeblood.
They form your identity, your work, and your impact on the world. But ideas are not static, nor should they be. Just as you evolve, so too should your thinking.
What Ludwig and Eddie experienced is a testament to intellectual growth. We must not fear revising our work, even when it means challenging what we once believed.
And yet, there's a danger here.
The Immediacy Bias
The Immediacy Bias, also known as presentism in thought, is the tendency to weigh our current thoughts, feelings, and projects as more significant or valuable than those from our past.
This psychological phenomenon is rooted in our inherent inclination to favor the present.
The 'now' is vivid and immediate, commanding our attention and overshadowing our past. This bias can blind us to the value of our past ideas, causing us to overlook their merit or impact.
Consider Wittgenstein and Van Halen.
Both were pioneers in their respective fields, producing early - first - work that left a lasting impact. Yet they found themselves questioning the worth of their early creations, unable to see their value as clearly as their audiences did. Their narratives reflect a classic manifestation of the immediacy bias, as they were swayed by their current beliefs and perceptions, undervaluing their influential past work.
This immediacy bias can hinder our ability to appreciate the full trajectory of our intellectual journey, focusing too heavily on the present at the expense of the past.
In navigating the path of thought leadership, it's vital to acknowledge this bias and seek a more balanced perspective that recognizes the value of past ideas, even as we continue to develop new ones.
How Can Thought Leaders Navigate this Tug of War?
Recognizing this dynamic is the first step.
As you progress in your journey, remember, your growth will naturally lead you to question and evolve your past work. This evolution is not a sign of failure or inconsistency, but a testament to your growth and intellectual courage.
Wittgenstein’s later work, captured in post-humous works like The Philosophical Investigations, is equally revered. Just as many scholars today defend it against the Tractatus. Personally, as a young student on philosophy, I greatly prefered the Investigations.
Eddie Van Halen eventually developed a new tone when he invented an amplifier called the 5150. That amplifier redefined rock and metal guitar tone for the next generation (90s onward), and is still revered to this day as one of the greatest amps of all time.
It’s a staple of recording studios the world over, and the original models fetch a small fortune on auction sites.
The point is, if either Edward or Wittgenstein had stopped working to make their ideas better, to challenge their own assumptions, we’d never have received the Investigations or the 5150 amp.
Shiny Object Syndrome
Still, don't dismiss the worth of your earlier ideas because they seem less shiny or intriguing than your latest thoughts.
Remember, your past ideas have value and may still resonate powerfully with others, even if you've moved on to new intellectual landscapes.
Both Ludwig and Eddie created legacies, despite their self-critiques. Their work impacted countless individuals, prompting thought, inspiration, and debate. As a thought leader, your ideas will take on a life of their own, influencing others in ways you might not even imagine.
So, don't stifle your evolution nor belittle your past. Embrace the ebb and flow of ideas. After all, the dance between evolution and immediacy bias is an integral part of the thought leader's journey.
How to Maintain this Balance
To put these insights into practice, here are some steps you can take:
First, engage in regular self-reflection to understand how your ideas have evolved.
Second, commit to continuous learning, exposing yourself to new perspectives that challenge your thinking. Encourage feedback from others, maintaining a balance of confidence in your ideas and the humility to revise them when necessary.
Finally, celebrate your intellectual growth. Acknowledge the value of your past ideas, but don't shy away from developing new ones.
Moving Forward
The tension between our past achievements and our present pursuits is a common thread running through the fabric of thought leadership.
This tug of war between evolving ideas and the immediacy bias underscores the dynamic nature of intellectual growth.
As you continue your own journey, I challenge you to become more aware of this bias, and strive to create a space that honors your past, nourishes your present, and fuels your future growth.
May we all make a dent in the universe so substantial and long-lasting that we end up arguing with our own supporters.
Free Mini-course
